Legal Opinion
Peerless Insurance v. Wells
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 29, 1990No. 89-349PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.
Defendants, the Alíanos, appeal from a declaratory judgment determining that plaintiff is not obligated to pay damages to defendant Wells under a general liability policy issued by plaintiff to the Alíanos. We affirm.
The parties stipulated to the material facts, which disclose that in July of 1984, defendant Wells entered into a contract with the Alíanos for them to construct her home. The home did not have a basement, but was to be constructed on a concrete slab floor on grade. The contract required the contractors to provide for necessary fill and compaction, as well as the construction of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- LaMarche v. Shelby Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Federal Insurance Company v. PAT Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Garneau v. Curtis & Bedell, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Village of Morrisville Water & Light Department v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1991
- USX Corp. v. Adriatic Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Solers, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Hardwick Recycling & Salvage, Inc. v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.