Legal Opinion
Village of Morrisville Water & Light Department v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided October 4, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-322PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFRIN, Senior District Judge.
This diversity action involves a dispute between an insurer and its insured concerning coverage for environmental clean-up costs mandated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). Specifically, the Village of Morrisville Water & Light Department (“Morrisville”) seeks an injunction and a declaratory judgment stating that the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (“Fidelity”) must defend and indemnify Morrisville for the claims made against it…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Hazen Paper Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. Bronson Plating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Edgerton v. General Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Burlington v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.