Legal Opinion

Garneau v. Curtis & Bedell, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 24, 1992No. 91-183PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

This controversy over insurance coverage arises out of a lawsuit brought by plaintiffs, Martin and Melissa Garneau, against defendant Curtis & Bedell, Inc. (C & B), a contractor, over the construction of a house on plaintiffs’ land. The house was built too close to the property line in violation of zoning requirements, and plaintiffs sued C & B for the cost of remedying the problem. C & B then brought a third-party complaint against its insurer, the Insurance Company of North America (INA), alleging that INA had a duty to defend it in the suit and to indemnify it for costs and damages it…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Allstate Insurance v. ZukNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Indiana Insurance v. DeZuttiIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Diamond Heights Homeowners Ass'n v. National American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Kelly v. Town of BarnardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. City of Burlington v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  2. Applied Bolting Technology Products, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Hardwick Recycling & Salvage, Inc. v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. Bixler v. BullardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. Co-Operative Insurance Companies v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API