Legal Opinion
Clements v. Pasadena Finance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1967No. 21002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COPPLE, District Judge:
This is an appeal from a summary judgment of the District Court in favor of the defendant below and against the plaintiff, Trustee in Bankruptcy. Plaintiff has appealed.
The sole question for review is whether or not there was sufficient compliance with the requirements of California Civil Code Section 3440(h), which reads in pertinent part as follows:
Ҥ 3340. Transfers and liens without delivery
Conclusive presumption of fraud
Every transfer of personal property and every lien on personal property made by a person having at the time the possession or control of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ley v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Municipal Improvement Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Reichardt v. ReichardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Union Oil Co. v. DomengeauxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Charles Leonard Elliott v. City of Union CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Clements v. Pasadena Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967