Anne M. Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Two notices of appeal have been filed seeking review of the district court’s order dismissing one of the defendant’s below. In addition the second notice of appeal seeks review of the district court’s refusal to enter judgment under Rule 54(b) F.R.Civ.P. To the extent that the notices seek review of the dismissal they are premature because judgment has not yet been entered under Rule 54(b).
The question of review of the denial of a Rule 54(b) motion is more difficult. While Sears, Roebuck & Co., v. Mackey, 351 U.S. 427, 437, 76 S.Ct. 895, 900, 100 L.Ed. 1297 (1956) suggests…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Brunswick Corporation and Sherwood Medical Industries, Inc. v. David S. Sheridan and National Catheter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- In Re Bromley-Heath Modernization CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Frederick C. Zangardi v. Walter N. TobrinerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
3Cited by23 opinions
- Professor Harriet Spiegel v. The Trustees of Tufts CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Fore River Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- New Castle County v. Hartford Accident And Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Pedraza v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.