Legal Opinion

In Re Bromley-Heath Modernization Committee

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 22, 1971No. 71-1279_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs seek a writ of mandamus to order the district court, which has refused to do so, to enter a partial final judgment with respect to its order dismissing certain of their claims, pursuant to the discretionary powers afforded to it under F.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Plaintiffs offer no case where this has been done. Nor do they meet successfully the heavy burden, Will v. United States, 1967, 389 U.S. 90, 95-96, 88 S.Ct. 269, 19 L.Ed.2d 305, that lies upon them to obtain such extraordinary relief.

Prior to Rule 54(b) there was no right of appeal in the situation where the district court disposed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Professor Harriet Spiegel v. The Trustees of Tufts CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Page v. PreisserCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. Anne M. Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  4. Bank of New York v. HoytDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
  5. Marshall v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API