Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1999No. CV-97-0448-PRPublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 Southern California Edison Company, Nevada Power Company, the Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, and the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District (collectively “the Utilities”) are parties to a contract with Peabody Western Coal Company (“Peabody”). The contract contains a clause requiring arbitration of some, but not all, disputes. The Utilities petition this court to review the court of appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from the trial judge’s order compelling arbitration. We are asked to decide whether the order…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  3. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Broemmer v. Abortion Services of Phoenix, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Filanto, S.P.A. v. Chilewich International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Wells v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Collins v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  3. Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. v. William Hamilton Smythe, IIITennessee Supreme Court · 2013

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API