Legal Opinion
Frederick C. Zangardi v. Walter N. Tobriner
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 5, 1964No. 17900_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellee Commissioners of the District of Columbia fixed the retirement allowance of the appellant, a member of the Metropolitan Police Department, at 40 per cent of his pay. He contends it should be 66% per cent. We intimate no view on this question. It turns on the construction of the D.C.Code (1961), particularly §§ 4-526 and 4-527.
Appellant filed a complaint in two counts against the Commissioners. Count One asks for a mandatory injunction requiring the defendants to pay him the larger allowance. Count Two asks for a declaratory judgment that he is entitled to the larger allowance.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Joseph S. Robbin v. The American University, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
3Cited by6 opinions
- J. B. L. Construction Co. v. Lincoln Homes Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Anne M. Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. McDonnell-Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Joseph S. Robbin v. The American University, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Build of Buffalo, Inc. v. Frank A. Sedita, as Mayor and Chief Executive of the City of BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.