Legal Opinion

Bowden-Gazzam Co. v. Kent

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1944No. 29345PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action, which is a companion case to Bowden-Gazzam Co. v. Hogan, ante p. 27, was originally commenced by Bowden-Gazzam Company against Earl Kent and wife, in December, 1941. Subsequently, on January 5, 1943, an amended complaint was filed, wherein, in addition to Earl- Kent and wife, many others were made defendants,' among them Helen McReavy Andersen, state of Washington, and Mason county.

The action was instituted for the purpose of quieting plaintiff’s title to all second-class tidelands in front of government lot 4, section 32, township 22 north, range 3 west W. M., Mason county,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peoples Savings Bank v. Frank BuffordWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Roesch v. GerstWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hawk v. WalthewWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Peeples v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Simonson v. VeitCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Harkins v. Del PozziWashington Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API