Legal Opinion

Harkins v. Del Pozzi

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1957No. 34061PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

This is an action to quiet title. It presents but a single primary question: Where is the proper boundary line between second-class tidelands owned by one person and the adjacent uplands owned by another?

The cause was tried to the court. It determined the line of ordinary high tide as of the year 1910, and that it was relatively unchanged at the present time; that there was insufficient substantial or reliable evidence to establish the line of ordinary high tide to have been further landward at any earlier date; and that the owner of the second-class tidelands had acquired title to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. First National Bank v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Adams v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Driesbach v. LynchIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Harper v. HolstonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Lara v. SandellWashington Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Anderson v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hughes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hughes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API