Simonson v. Veit
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.
Defendants Herbert and Marilyn Veit (the Veits) appeal the trial court order granting plaintiff Hilmer Simonson a prescriptive easement across their property and enjoining them from obstructing the easement, arguing that the 10-year period was not met because the State was title owner for part of that time. Because adverse possession may not be asserted against the State, we reverse the trial court decision and dismiss the case.
Simonson lives on lot 16 next to the Veits who occupy lot 17. (See diagram.) Before 1968, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 were owned by the State of Washington. For a number of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thomas v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Communist Party of Indiana v. WhitcombSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seattle-First National Bank v. KawachiWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Roediger v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. Permanente Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- GRANITE BEACH HOLDINGS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Granite Beach Holdings, L.L.C. v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- City of Benton City v. AdrianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Pioneer National Title Insurance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Hall v. Seattle School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.