Legal Opinion

Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1929No. Docket No. 3769PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This is an action to quiet title to a strip of land formerly occupied by the defendant Railway Company as a right of way. The complaint is in the usual short form. The answer of the defendants Young and Alphonso and Margaret Swaboda deny the allegations of the complaint. Their denial of the allegation that their claims are unfounded is in the following language: “Defendants deny that the claims of said defendants and each of them or of said defendants or each of them are without any right whatever and deny that said defendants or either of them have no estate, right, title or interest in or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Land Co. v. ZeissSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Riley v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Hyatt v. ColkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rael v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Conlin v. BlanchardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Couey v. Talalah Estates Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. McKinley Bros. v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Leydecker v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API