Ralphs v. Hensler
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to foreclose a mortgage on defendant Hensler’s real property, given to secure the payment of three several promissory notes.
It is alleged in the complaint that the notes and mortgage were executed by defendant Hensler to Kimball Hardy in his lifetime (on July 9, 1887); that on or about February 16, 1889, Hardy'died; that his will was *299admitted to probate on March 12, 1889; that letters testamentary were duly issued to plaintiff on March 18, 1889; and thereupon, that the plaintiff duly qualified and entered upon his duties as such executor.
By her answer, the defendant Hensler…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Taylor v. Agricultural & Mechanical Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Ward v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by42 opinions
- Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Hale v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Common Wealth Insurance Systems, Inc. v. KerstenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Popcorn Equipment Co. v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.