Legal Opinion

Illinois Surety Co. v. Hendrick

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 23, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Miller

Affirming.

In 1913, the appellees John K. Hendrick and Hal S. Corbett, composing the law firm of Hendrick' & Corbett, recovered a judgment in the McCracken circuit court against James E. Wilhelm and others, for $1,200.00. Wilhelm and his co-defendants prosecuted an appeal to the Court of Appeals and executed a supersedeas bond, with the Hlinois Surety Company as surety thereon.

The bond substantially followed section 748 of the Civil Code and bound the appellant “to pay to the appellees all the costs and damages that may be adjudged against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Methodist Churches of New York v. . BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Alexander v. GishCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Pugh's adm'r v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peck v. Curlee Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Maryland Casualty Company v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Wilhelm v. HendrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Big Sandy Commercial Bank v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Tackett v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API