Maryland Casualty Company v. Marshall
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Dietzman—
Affirming.
As these two eases involve the same question, they will he disposed of by one opinion.
These suits arise out of two earlier suits, which reached this court under the style of Wallins Creek Collieries Co. v. Marshall and Wallins Creek Collieries Co. v. Ward, reported in 217 Ky. 647, 290 S. W. 519. In those cases Marshall and a number of other employees of the Wallins Creek Collieries Company, employed at mine A of the Collieries Company, and Ward and a number of other employees of the Collieries Company employed at mine B, sued the Collieries…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pacific National Bank v. MixterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wermeling v. WermelingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Stevenson v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Wing v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Alexander v. GishCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crook v. SchumannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Lloyds Casualty Insurer v. FarrarTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Roach v. Wallins Creek Collieries Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
- Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Phillips v. Green, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.