Legal Opinion
Peck v. Curlee Clothing Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 9, 1917No. 7620PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Error from the County Court, Stephens County; J. W. Marshall, Judge. Action by the Curlee Clothing Company against I’. H. Peck and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, O. J.
On May 11, 1911, the Cur-lee Clothing Company recovered judgment in the county court of Stephens county against the Comanche Mercantile Company. In July following, the mercantile company as principal, and P. H. Peck as surety, executed and filed in the county court a supersedeas bond in words and figures as follows, omitting caption and qualification of the surety:
“Know all men by these presents: That Comanche Mercantile Company, principal ob-ligor, and P. H. Peck, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto Curlee Clothing Company, plaintiff in the above-entitled cause, in the sum…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Starr v. McClainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Mose v. District Court of Marshall CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Woodward v. BinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Dunterman v. StoreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Blanchard v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Graham v. D & K Oilfield Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Howe v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- McCarger v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Crofut-Knapp Co. v. WeberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.