Legal Opinion

State v. Bradshaw

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2006No. 20040975PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

11 Representing himself as an owner of a mortgage company, Brooks Bradshaw assured his fourteen victims that he could help them refinance their current mortgages. After collecting fees from his victims, Mr. Bradshaw disappeared.

1 2 Mr. Bradshaw was charged with eleven counts of communications fraud.1 The district court concluded that Mr. Bradshaw's defraudation of his fourteen victims was part of a single "scheme or artifice." As such, Mr. Bradshaw was exposed to conviction for eleven second degree felonies under Utah's communications fraud statute, Utah Code Ann.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Weiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  3. United States v. ZemekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Von Dale Massey, Sr., United States of America v. Sandra Wilkins, United States of America v. Jack Z. WilkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. David M. Pharis Edward J. Habina William M. Dull Harry GangloffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RossUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Unigard Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Roberts v. C.R. England, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2017
  4. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. SquiresCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API