Legal Opinion
United States v. Von Dale Massey, Sr., United States of America v. Sandra Wilkins, United States of America v. Jack Z. Wilkins
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1995No. 93-6026 to 93-6028PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Three codefendants appeal from their convictions and sentences arising out of an extensive fraud scheme. On appeal, they complain that: 1) there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions; 2) the court’s sentences violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution; 3) the court erred in not granting their motions for a mistrial; 4) the court double-counted certain conduct during sentencing; 5) there was an illegal disparity between the sentences of coeonspirators; 6) the court improperly admitted evidence of the prior bad acts of one defendants’…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Robert L. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Marmon Dennis RecordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- United States v. DazeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Glennis L. Bolden, United States of America v. Clifford E. BoldenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. QuarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Comm. Fut. L. Rep. P 26,490 United States of America v. William R. Kennedy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.