Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2009No. 20070328PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

11 In this case, we consider whether the court of appeals correctly construed Utah Code section 76-3-401,1 which governs the imposition of concurrent or consecutive sentences. David Scott Anderson, the defendant in this case, pled guilty to theft. A district court judge placed Mr. Anderson on probation, staying the prison sentence of zero to five years. A year later, after being convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery while on probation, a second judge sentenced Mr. Anderson to two concurrent indeterminate terms of not less than six years. This judge did not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. GrandersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. BowersUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. YazzieUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. HassanUtah Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. YazzieUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. OLP, L.L.C. v. BurninghamUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  4. State v. WimberlyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API