State v. Anderson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEHRING, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
11 In this case, we consider whether the court of appeals correctly construed Utah Code section 76-3-401,1 which governs the imposition of concurrent or consecutive sentences. David Scott Anderson, the defendant in this case, pled guilty to theft. A district court judge placed Mr. Anderson on probation, staying the prison sentence of zero to five years. A year later, after being convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery while on probation, a second judge sentenced Mr. Anderson to two concurrent indeterminate terms of not less than six years. This judge did not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. GrandersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BowersUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. YazzieUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HassanUtah Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. YazzieUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- OLP, L.L.C. v. BurninghamUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- State v. WimberlyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.