United States v. Zemek
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Appellants attack the sufficiency of the evidence to support their convictions for a racketeering conspiracy and numerous substantive offenses connected therewith. They also assign error to designated instructions and evidentiary rulings. We affirm.
Count 1 of the seventeen count indictment charged fifteen confederates with conspiring over a seven-year period (1971 to 1978) to conduct the affairs of an “enterprise”, the tavern business of Pierce County, Washington, through a pattern of racketeering. 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).
The alleged racketeering activities…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Glen Sutherland, Edward Maynard and Grace WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Sekhar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Nile SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Frank Adipietro, United States of America v. Vincent Auricchio, United States of America v. Ruben O. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.