Legal Opinion
Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 17, 1990No. A8704-02489; CA A60011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*117EDMONDS, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment n.o.v. ORCP 63. The trial court ruled that plaintiffs action is barred by the Statute of Limitations. ORS 12.110(1).1 We reverse, because the trial court was without authority to enter the judgment.
Plaintiff, a professional jockey, was injured while racing a horse at defendant’s race track. The complaint alleged that defendant was negligent and that, as a result, plaintiff suffered personal injuries. Defendant’s pretrial motion to dismiss “the entire case based on the statute of limitations” was denied. At trial, defendant moved for a directed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Hendrix v. McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Huston v. Trans-Mark Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Stark v. HennemanOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Barr v. Linnton Plywood Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Delmar Crawford, Inc. v. RUSSELL OIL CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Meoli v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990