Legal Opinion

Stark v. Henneman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1968PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action to recover damages for conversion of an automobile. Plaintiff had a verdict for compensatory-and punitive damages. Thereafter the defendants moved for judgment n.o.v. with regard only to the verdict for punitive damages. The court allowed the motion and denied an alternative motion for a new trial, also limited to the question of punitive damages.

Owing to the state of the record we do not reach the question whether the evidence is sufficient to justify an award of punitive damages.

Although the motion of the defendant for judgment n.o.v. states as ground therefor “that a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. German v. Kienow's Food StoresOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Merritt v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Carey v. LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Thompson & Georgeson, Inc. v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Crooks v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gardner v. First Escrow Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Huston v. Trans-Mark Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. MacCrone v. Edwards Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API