Legal Opinion

Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 10, 1993No. A8704-02489; CA A60011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

This appeal is before v. on remand from the Supreme Court. 312 Or 376, 823 P2d 956 (1991). Plaintiff, a professional jockey, brought this negligence action after he was injured while riding at defendant’s racetrack. The jury returned a verdict in his favor but, before judgment was entered, defendant filed a motion for judgment n.o.v., arguing that the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations. ORS 12.110(1). Defendant’s motion to dismiss on that ground had been denied before trial. Defendant had pled the Statute of Limitations as an affirmative defense but did not raise the defense as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Dotson v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stark v. HennemanOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Robertson v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. McBrideColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Faverty v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Tooker v. FeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Meoli v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Peery v. HanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API