Legal Opinion
Washington International Insurance Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 16, 1994No. 93-1114PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals the October 6, 1992, judgment of the Court of International Trade, No. 84-05-00660, holding that “Rhino-hide,” a waterproof roofing material, is correctly classifiable under item 771.43 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (1981). We affirm.
Background
This case is about the proper classification of “Rhinohide,” a waterproof roofing membrane, under the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) (1981). Rhinohide is a modified bitumen one-ply roofing membrane which is used to waterproof roofs. Analysis by Customs determined that by weight,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hills Materials Company v. Donald B. Rice, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- The United States v. Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- V.G. Nahrgang Co., F/a Anthony Paglialungo v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- General Methods Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Pillsbury Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Benson v. Family Dollar Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.