Stanford v. Paris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs instituted this action on 13 October 2006 seeking a declaratory judgment as to the construction of Charles Whitson Stanford, Jr.’s (decedent) holographic will that, after certain specific bequests, left “[a]ll stocks, bonds, and real estate, saving account and E Bonds wheresoever situate [including] ... all stock in Redfields, Inc. left to me by my father, Charles W. Stanford, Sr.” to his sisters Jean Stanford Mann and Jane Stanford Paris. The will did not contain a residuary clause. Decedent died 19 May 1990, having never married and leaving no children.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Stagecoach VillageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Triad Women's Center, P.A. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Williams v. DEVERE CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Northern Star Management of America, LLC v. SedlacekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Union Cty. v. Town of MarshvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Cherry Cmty. Org. v. Stonehunt, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.