Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Paris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 27, 2010No. 208PA09PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs instituted this action on 13 October 2006 seeking a declaratory judgment as to the construction of Charles Whitson Stanford, Jr.’s (decedent) holographic will that, after certain specific bequests, left “[a]ll stocks, bonds, and real estate, saving account and E Bonds wheresoever situate [including] ... all stock in Redfields, Inc. left to me by my father, Charles W. Stanford, Sr.” to his sisters Jean Stanford Mann and Jane Stanford Paris. The will did not contain a residuary clause. Decedent died 19 May 1990, having never married and leaving no children.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Stagecoach VillageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Triad Women's Center, P.A. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Williams v. DEVERE CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Northern Star Management of America, LLC v. SedlacekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Union Cty. v. Town of MarshvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  5. Cherry Cmty. Org. v. Stonehunt, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API