Legal Opinion

Macedo v. Macedo

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1938No. Civ. No. 5963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

These parties were married in February, 1-932, and lived together until 1936, when they separated. Appellant herein, as plaintiff, then brought an action to annul the marriage upon the ground that at the time of marriage Mary Macedo had a husband then living.

It was true that at the date of the marriage between the parties hereto a former marriage between defendant herein and one Moreira was undissolved. An action for divorce had been instituted and an interlocutory decree had been entered September 10, 1930.

The complaint in this action seeking annulment was filed November 6, 1936. On November…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Stohr v. San Francisco Musical Fund SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Corbett v. CorbettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. In re Estate of WixomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MacEdo v. MacEdoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API