Legal Opinion

Schuler v. Eckert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

The plaintiffs commenced suit against the defendant in justice's court on the 3d day of May, *1661889. The .summons stated that it was issued for the enforcement of a lien for the sum of $100 upon certain described premises “for the personal work and labor of plaintiffs and their help on a building thereon.” The lien, as filed, claimed $65.50 balance upon an estimate, and $42.05 for specified extra work; making a total,- of $107.55.

Plaintiffs declared orally in assumpsit for work and labor performed by themselves and those in their employ upon the building mentioned in the summons.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Mount Hood Ry. & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Abercrombie & Williams v. VandiverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Darling Milling Co. v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API