Lasley v. Preston
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Mackinac; Shepherd, J. Assumpsit by S. Henry Lasley against William P. Preston for the use and occupation of certain land. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This action is brought to recover for the use and occupation of certain real estate. The case 'was heard by the trial judge, who made certain findings of fact and conclusions of law.. The case is brought here by writ of error.
The record does not purport to contain the evidence taken in the court below. We cannot say, from it, that there was not an abundance of evidence upon which to base the findings of fact. These must be deemed to be conclusive. Bateman v. Blaisdell, 83 Mich. 357 (47 N. W. 223); First Nat. Bank of Paw Paw v. Walker, 115 Mich. 434 (73 N. W. 378); Darling Milling Co. v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoffman v. BuschmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Hoffman v. SilverthornMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Bateman v. BlaisdellMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- First National Bank of Paw Paw v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Darling Milling Co. v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930