United States v. Smith
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7380 (T. D. 32080).
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge
The merchandise involved in this case consists of herring and mackerel, separately packed in sealed tin cans, and severally invoiced as fresh herring, soused herring, herring in bouillon, herring in tomato sauce; fresh mackerel, soused mackerel, and mackerel in tomato sauce.
The goods were imported under the tariff act of 1909 and were classified by the collector as “fish in tin packages.” They were accordingly assessed with duty at the rate of 30 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 270 of the act.
The importers duly protested the assessment, claiming the importations to be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. RosensteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Ahlbrecht & Son v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arnold Sorensin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. La MannaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Smith & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Seeman Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.