Legal Opinion

Seeman Bros. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 17, 1924No. 2393PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of smoked herring in tomato sauce, imported in tin containers weighing less than 15 *422pounds each, and kippered herring, imported in tin containers weighing less than 15 pounds each. It was assessed for duty by the collector at 25 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 720 of the tariff act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Par. 720. Pish (except shellfish), by whatever name known, packed in oil or in oil and other.substances, 30 per centum ad valorem; all fish (except shellfish) , pickled, salted, smoked, kippered, or otherwise prepared or preserved…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. A. Goldmark & Sons Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Boak v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Bright Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API