United States v. Rosenstein
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from decision of Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7070 (T. D. 30794).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
The Board of General Appraisers held the importation dutiable under paragraph 272 of the tariff act of 1909, which reads as follows:
Herrings, pickled or salted, smoked or kippered, one-half of one cent per pound;herrings, fresh, one-fourth of one cent per pound; eels and smelts, fresh or frozen, three-fourths of one cent per pound.
*305The Government claims that they are dutiable under paragraph 270, which, after providing for fish packed in oil, etc., reads:
All other fish (except shellfish) in tin packages, thirty per centum ad valorem; fish in packages, containing less than one-hall barrel, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sonn v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arnold Sorensin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. La MannaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Smith & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.