Legal Opinion

Ahlbrecht & Son v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 23, 1912No. 643; No. 644PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7198 (T. D. 31474).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

These two appeals were heard together, and involve the dutiable, classification of herring. The Ahlbrecht appeal covers pickled herring packed in tins, and the Menzel appeal, smoked herring packed *472in tins. Duty was assessed thereon at 30 per cent under paragraph 270, tariff act of 1909, as “all other fish (except shellfish) in tin packages.” Paragraph 270 reads:

270. Fish (except shellfish) by whatever name known, packed in oil, in bottles, jars, kegs, tin boxes, or cans, shall be dutiable as follows: When in packages containing seven and one-half cubic inches or less, one and one-half cents…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arnold Sorensin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Bayersdorfer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Smith & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. United States v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. Bayersdorfer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API