Legal Opinion
United States v. Keleta
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 28, 2006No. CRIM. 05-371(CKK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON RULE 29 PARTIAL MOTION FOR A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1960(a), “Whoever knowingly conducts, controls, manages, supervises, directs, or owns all or part of an unlicensed money transmitting business, shall be fined in accordance with this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.” 18 U.S.C. § 1960(a). The term “unlicensed money transmitting business” as defined in the alternative under 18 U.S.C. § 1960(b)(1)(B) “means a money transmitting business which affects interstate or foreign commerce in any manner or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Curtis D. Ables (96-6715) and Jackie Lamkin (96-6643)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. O'Brien (Dorothy)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. TalebnejadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- United States v. UddinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- United States v. BarreDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. E-Gold, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008