Legal Opinion

United States v. Barre

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 6, 2004No. 03-CR-3067-BPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant Ismail Barre was indicted on one count: knowingly conducting, controlling, managing, supervising, directing, or owning all or part of an unlicensed money transmitting business, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1960(a) and (b)(1)(A). On April 5, 2004, I granted Defendant’s motion to declare 18 U.S.C. § 1960(b)(1)(A) unconstitutional because I concluded it infringed on Defendant’s right to equal protection. See United States v. Barre, 313 F.Supp.2d 1086 (D.Colo.2004). The government, lacking trenchant analysis in its response to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. New York City Transit Authority v. BeazerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. United States v. SharpnackSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. E-Gold, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. United States v. UddinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  3. United States v. KeletaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API