United States v. Barre
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
Defendant Ismail Barre was indicted on one count: knowingly conducting, controlling, managing, supervising, directing, or owning all or part of an unlicensed money transmitting business, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1960(a) and (b)(1)(A). On April 5, 2004, I granted Defendant’s motion to declare 18 U.S.C. § 1960(b)(1)(A) unconstitutional because I concluded it infringed on Defendant’s right to equal protection. See United States v. Barre, 313 F.Supp.2d 1086 (D.Colo.2004). The government, lacking trenchant analysis in its response to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- New York City Transit Authority v. BeazerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. SharpnackSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. E-Gold, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States v. UddinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- United States v. KeletaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006