Legal Opinion

United States v. E-Gold, Ltd.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 8, 2008No. Criminal Action 07-109 (RMC)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Title 18 of the United States Code (“U.S.C.”) sets out federal law covering Crimes and Criminal Procedure. Title 31 of the U.S.C. sets out federal law covering Money and Finance, including the Internal Revenue Code. 18 U.S.C. § 1960 makes it a crime to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business. Section 1960 defines what it means to be unlicensed and what it means to engage in money transmitting. By those definitions, a business can clearly engage in money transmitting without limiting its transactions to cash or currency and would…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Huashan Zhang v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. MurgioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. United States v. BlochDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Telematch, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  5. Telematch, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API