Legal Opinion

United States v. Curtis D. Ables (96-6715) and Jackie Lamkin (96-6643)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 12, 1999No. 96-6643, 96-6715PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

Curtis D. Abies and Jackie Lamkin were convicted by a jury on various federal charges arising from their operation of a bingo hall in violation of Kentucky law. Lamkin appeals from her convictions solely on the basis that 18 U.S.C. § 1955, which prohibits the conducting of an illegal gambling business, is unconstitutional. Abies, who also challenges the constitutionality of § 1955, puts forth numerous additional grounds to vacate his convictions and prison sentence. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the convictions of both Abies and Lamkin, and further AFFIRM…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine HartwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Phillip James GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Philip A. ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Rebecca K. Crossley (99-4076) Starla Grubich (99-4080),defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Donald G. Ford (97-6097/6270) Sandra Hutchins Ford (97-6271)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API