United States v. O'Brien (Dorothy)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Dorothy and Michael O’Brien, together with their son Christopher O’Brien, appeal a jury’s finding that they operated an illegal gambling business in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955, and conspired to do so in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Their primary challenge on appeal is to the sufficiency of the evidence adduced at trial. Additionally, Christopher and Dorothy assert errors in the instructions given to the jury; and Christopher challenges the admission in evidence of certain records.
I
The O’Briens do not dispute that a gambling business was operated on property co-owned…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. WackerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Bowie, JuanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Curtis D. Ables (96-6715) and Jackie Lamkin (96-6643)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.