Legal Opinion

United States v. O'Brien (Dorothy)

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 30, 1997No. 96-5228, 96-5229 and 96-5230PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Dorothy and Michael O’Brien, together with their son Christopher O’Brien, appeal a jury’s finding that they operated an illegal gambling business in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955, and conspired to do so in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Their primary challenge on appeal is to the sufficiency of the evidence adduced at trial. Additionally, Christopher and Dorothy assert errors in the instructions given to the jury; and Christopher challenges the admission in evidence of certain records.

I

The O’Briens do not dispute that a gambling business was operated on property co-owned…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. WackerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Bowie, JuanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Curtis D. Ables (96-6715) and Jackie Lamkin (96-6643)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API