Legal Opinion

Jones v. Chiles

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 9, 1834PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Circuit Court for Montgomery County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Underwood

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The lessor of the plaintiff claimed the land in controversy under two grants to William Hays — one feefcrinjf date in May, 1813, the other in June, 1801.

The defendant claimed under a grant to Jeremiah Moore, of two thousand acres, dated in August, 1785.

The lessor obtained a verdict and judgment, and the defendant has appealed.

It is clear, that the verdict and judgment arc erroneous, unless the lessor, and those under whom he claims, have had such a continued adverse possession of the land in controversy as to toll the right of entry founded *26on…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Walsh v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Smith v. GayleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Tennis Coal Co. v. SackettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Everidge v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Secombe v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1858

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API