Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Patterson

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Decided October 15, 1827PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On error to the C. P. of Monroe. The cause came here on a bill of exceptions taken by the plaintiffs below, who are aiso the plaintiffs in error. The facts material to the . . case are stated in the opinion of the court. cited 8 John. 185; 7 T. R. 170; 4 id. 633 to 648; 1 Burr. 20; 2 Tid. Pr. 921, 922, 929, 930, 737, 15 John. 147; 6 Com. Dig. Retorn, (F. 2. ;) 12 John. 403. cited 8 John. 189: 4 T. R. 633 ; 4 Mass. Rep. 40; 7 id. 123; 8 John. 188; 1 Burr. 37; 15 John. 151.

1Opinion of the Court

®uria, per Sutherland, J.

This was an action on the case for a false return, brought against the defendant as sheriff of the county of Monroe. The suit was brought in the court of common pleas of that county; and exceptions were taken to the charge of the court, upon which the cause has been brought into this court by writ of error.

The execution upon which the false return was alleged 1 . ■ ? to have been made, was a fi. fa. m favor of the plaintiffs, against one James M. Christopher. Under that execution, the deputy of the defendant, by the direction of one of the plaintiffs, levied upon a…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Manning, Bowman Co. v. . KeenanNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Sponenbarger v. LemertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. State ex rel. O'Bryan v. KoontzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Long v. NevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Shaw v. ChesterNew York Court of Chancery · 1834

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API