Legal Opinion
Toulmin v. James Mfg. Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 8, 1939No. 2235PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
The plaintiffs are residents of the State of Ohio. Defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin, qualified to do business in New York State. Defendant owns and operates an office and plant in this ‘district. This suit is brought to recover for services alleged to have been performed by the plaintiffs for defendant.
The defendant appears specially and moves to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that this court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit or the parties thereto. The question raised as to the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In Re Keasbey & Mattison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Vilter Mfg. Co. v. RolaffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Sil-Flo Corporation v. BowenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- D. W. Onan & Sons, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Ward v. Studebaker Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.