Legal Opinion

Ward v. Studebaker Sales Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 8, 1940No. 7227PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

The appellee here is in the embarrassing position of the small boy in the apple orchard. The farmer has pulled the ladder from under the tree. In the case at bar, the farmer is the United States Supreme Court and it has pulled the same ladder from under the various “inferior” Federal courts.1

That ladder was reliance upon the Supreme Court’s previous interpretation of Section 51 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S. C.A. § 112, Southern Pacific Co. v. Denton, 146 U.S. 202, 13 S.Ct. 44, 36 L.Ed. 942. It is true that the majority of the High Court disclaim any intention of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Baldwin v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. Kelly Pile & Foundation Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Coastal Club, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1942
  3. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Ferrante v. Trojan Powder Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Wachtler v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API