Legal Opinion

Bandall v. Duff

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1894No. 15283PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. The facts are stated in 71 Cal. 513, 79 Cal. 115, 87 Cal. 104, and in the opinion of the court in the present case.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C.J.

The opinions delivered upon a former appeal herein (see 79 Cal. 115) contain a sufficient statement of the nature of the controversy. The facts of the case of Duff v. Duff—which is inseparably connected with this case—will be found fully set out in an opinion just filed disposing of the third appeal in that case (see ante, p. 1), and in the reports of the two former appeals (71 Cal. 513, and 87 Cal. 104).

By our former judgment herein the cause was remanded for a new trial, which has been had, resulting in a judgment for the defendants, from which the plaintiff appeals.

The last trial took…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Randall v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Randall v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Randall v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Wilson v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Sanford v. Savings & Loan Soc.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API