Legal Opinion
Randall v. Duff
California Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1894No. 15718PublishedCited by 20 opinions
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment and order of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the following grounds:
“ 1. That the action of the lower court in modifying the judgment or decree in said action, as directed by the supreme court, was a ministerial act only, and one in which the lower court had no jurisdiction, and is not an act or order from which an appeal will lie.
“ 2. That the judgment or decree rendered in said action on the third day of June, 1892, and modified as directed by the supreme court on the third day of March, 1894, by the superior court, is a final judgment in said *127action, already approved and passed upon by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bandall v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. ThorneUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. JolkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Bradley v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Rebstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.