Randall v. Duff
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. The facts are stated in the opinions reported in 71 Cal. 513, 79 Cal. 115, 87 Cal. 104, 101 Cal. 82, 104 Cal. 126, and in the opinion of the court in the present case.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This case has been here twice before. (79 Cal. 115; 101 Cal. 82.) For a fuller statement of facts reference may be had to those appeals.
*34Plaintiff was appellant in the appeal reported in 101 Cal. 82. He then complained of the judgment in various respects. Among others, that the trial court allowed interest only up to March 15,1885, the date of the filing of the cross-complaint, because that court thought the cross-complaint contained a sufficient tender to stop interest. This court thought the offer or tender in the cross-bill insufficient for that purpose, and that interest should have been…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Randall v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Bandall v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gore v. BingamanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lossman v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- McNutt v. Nuevo Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Tuffree v. Stearns Ranchos Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.