Randall v. Duff
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the opinion of Mr. Commissioner Hayne.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
A rehearing was granted in this case after a decision by the court in Bank reversing the judgment and order of the superior court.
The opinion of Mr. Commissioner Hayne, upon which our decision was based, is reported at the end of this opinion.
With the exception that it does not show distinctly the fact that the action of Duff v. Duff was commenced and notice thereof filed prior to the commencement of either of the foreclosure suits under which respondent is a purchaser, that opinion contains a full and accurate statement of the facts out of which the controversy arises, and we refer to it for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Godchaux v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Dominguez v. MascottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Girdner v. BeswickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Stockwell v. McAlvayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Shields v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Duff v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Alcorn v. BuschkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.