Legal Opinion
Del Mar Canning Co. v. Payne
California Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1946No. S. F. 17373PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
Petitioner herein seeks a writ of mandate to compel the issuance of a permit to take and utilize pilchard sardines for reduction to meal in its Plant No. 2 for the 1946-47 season. Petitioner owns a building in Monterey in which are located a fish canning plant and two fish reduction plants designated for convenience “Plant No. 1” and “Plant No. 2.” Plant No. 2 was constructed in 1945 but no permit was issued by respondents for its operation in the 1945-46 sardine season because it was not completed by May 15, 1945.
For the 1946-47 season the respondent commission adopted a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Mayflower Farms, Inc. v. Ten EyckSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- County of Los Angeles v. Hollywood Cemetery Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In Re FassettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Soares v. City of Santa MariaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Werner v. Southern California Associated NewpapersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Knudsen Creamery Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. SpearsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- County of Los Angeles v. State Department of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.