Legal Opinion
In Re Fassett
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1937No. Crim. 420PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
—The petitioner was arrested pursuant to a complaint charging him with a violation of Ordinance No. 366 of Orange County which is entitled “An Ordinance regulating the operation and location of hog ranches and providing for the issuance of permits for such business in the county of Orange, State of California, and providing penalties for the violation thereof.”
The petitioner is an employee of the L. and N. Feeding Corporation. On February 18,1937, a permit to conduct a hog-ranch on certain premises described in the petition was issued to this corporation by the county of Orange. On March 30,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re WeisbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Lassen County v. ConeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by14 opinions
- Yoshioka v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Del Mar Canning Co. v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Accounting Corp. of America v. State Board of AccountancyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Associated Home Builders of the Greater East Bay, Inc. v. City of NewarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- In Re JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.