Legal Opinion

Knudsen Creamery Co. v. Brock

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1951No. L. A. 21422PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff sought declaratory relief for the purpose of testing the validity of an order issued by defendant, as Director of Agriculture, affecting the minimum price schedule for fluid milk distributed under the Stabilization and Marketing Plan governing the San Diego County Marketing Area. The trial court determined that the order was within the power and jurisdiction of defendant, and that its enforcement was not open to constitutional objection. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we are of the opinion that the trial court properly adjudicated the problem presented and that the judgment in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Christ v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Ralphs Grocery Co. v. ReimelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Credit Insurance General Agents Ass'n v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API