Cincinnati Insurance v. Diebold, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in the amount of $18,800 recovered by plaintiff-appellee Cincinnati Insurance Company (“CIC”) against defendant-appellant Diebold, Inc., together with an award of attorney fees in the amount of $5,005. Diebold contends that its employee, Kelly Moore, was not acting within the course and scope of his employment when he stole $18,800 in money contained in one safe-deposit box while “drilling” (changing the locks on) nine safe-deposit boxes pursuant to a contract between his employer and CIC’s subrogor, Farmer’s Banking Company, N.A. (“Farmer’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fulks v. FulksOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
- Sanfillipo v. RardenOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Direct Transportation Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
- Jackson v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by6 opinions
- McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- S & D Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Enting Water Conditioning Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
- National Hydro-Vac Industrial Services, L.L.C. v. Federal Signal Corp. (In Re National Hydro-Vac Industrial Services, L.L.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004
- Beerman Realty Co. v. Alloyd Asbestos Abatement Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.