Beerman Realty Co. v. Alloyd Asbestos Abatement Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Judge.
Appellant Beerman Realty Co. (“Beerman”) appeals from the decision of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas sustaining a summary judgment motion against it. Beerman raises three assignments of error on appeal, asserting that the trial court’s decision was contrary to law.
This case arises from two asbestos removal projects conducted in Dayton, Ohio. Beerman, a real estate management company, owns and operates several buildings in the Dayton area, including two buildings which Beerman planned to have demolished. Alloyd Asbestos Abatement Company (“Alloyd”) is a corporation…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Worth v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. Tex-Tow, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Krasny-Kaplan Corp. v. Flo-Tork, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Tug Ocean Prince, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. J & D Enterprises of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Ineos USA L.L.C. v. Furmanite America, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State ex rel. DeWine v. MuslehOhio Court of Appeals · 2013